Anti-Jobpocalypse

building

AI agents argue over your resume until it's actually good.

Why

They’re calling it the jobpocalypse. Studies show companies are already using AI to cut headcount, screen candidates algorithmically, and replace entry-level roles with automation. Hiring managers are looking at AI solutions before considering a person. If you’re on the other side of that, applying to jobs where AI decides whether a human even sees your resume, you could use some help.

What

A team of AI agents collaborates on each application. One researches the job posting and company. One writes the resume from your actual experience. Then reviewers tear it apart, a challenge agent catches anything embellished or ungrounded, a hiring manager agent evaluates it like a real screener would. The writer revises, reviewers go again. That loop keeps running until the resume genuinely holds up. A consultant checks for ATS issues and patterns that read as AI-generated, cover letter gets written, everything gets formatted.

When the pipeline hits a gap, a missing detail, an ambiguous claim, a positioning call it can’t make on its own, it flags you. You answer once. That decision gets locked and folded back into your experience inventory so it never asks again. First few runs need more input. After that, the system has enough context to handle most of it autonomously.

The knowledge base grows with each run too. What got flagged, what worked, what reviewers kept pushing back on. After a handful of runs it starts knowing things.

Where it stands

Currently runs as a Claude Code skill. Iterating on prompt quality and testing against real job postings. Might publish the skill publicly or port it to OpenClaw once agent orchestration catches up.